[PATCH] drbd: fix memory leak in drbd_adm_resize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Oleg Drokin <green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

new_disk_conf could be leaked if the follow on checks fail,
so make sure to free it on error if it was not assigned yet.

Found with smatch.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
I thought about just moving the allocation around so that
there is is no failure path after allocation, but looking
at the history of changes in that file, people tend to insert
extra checks at random places and that's how we ended up
with the current bug, so better let it fail and handle the failure.


 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
index 74df8cf..87fa774 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
@@ -2585,6 +2585,7 @@ int drbd_adm_resize(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 		mutex_unlock(&device->resource->conf_update);
 		synchronize_rcu();
 		kfree(old_disk_conf);
+		new_disk_conf = NULL;
 	}
 
 	ddsf = (rs.resize_force ? DDSF_FORCED : 0) | (rs.no_resync ? DDSF_NO_RESYNC : 0);
@@ -2618,6 +2619,7 @@ int drbd_adm_resize(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 
  fail_ldev:
 	put_ldev(device);
+	kfree(new_disk_conf);
 	goto fail;
 }
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux