[..] > I'm looking into this and while the code fix is correct, I'm not sure the > underlying code is correct. > > Unfortunately, the person who knows the most about this is out for spring > break. Can we hold off on this patch? Yes, the intended fix is good. In addition though, I think igb_enable_mas() should be changed to void and the call to it also modified, since there's no way to fail the enable. A previous implementation had a way to fail, but the current does not. Thanks, Carolyn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
