On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 13:30 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We refactored this code but accidentally left out a break statement so
> QUARK_X1000_SSP isn't handled correctly.
>
Thanks for catching this!
One comment below.
> Fixes: 025ffe88ee60 ('spi: pxa2xx: shift clk_div in one place')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> index 60526a5..a081cfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> @@ -791,6 +791,7 @@ static unsigned int pxa2xx_ssp_get_clk_div(struct driver_data *drv_data,
> switch (drv_data->ssp_type) {
> case QUARK_X1000_SSP:
> clk_div = quark_x1000_get_clk_div(rate, &chip->dds_rate);
> + break;
> default:
> clk_div = ssp_get_clk_div(drv_data, rate);
It would be nice to have a break here as well, but I think we also may
change this to if-else-if construction.
> }
Whatever solution you choose
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
And actually
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Now run with time to see the difference.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
