On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 01:48:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Darren, > > On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:46:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The people you will inconvenience more by rebasing are the developers > > who write patches that are based on your tree. If you rebase under > > them, they may have to rebase and fix up the patches they have already > > tested and had reviewed before they can then submit them to you > > (hopefully before you rebase again). > > This, of course, only applied to published trees (which includes > anything in linux-next) - what you do in your own (logically private) > development tree is your own business. Thanks for the guidance Stephen. Unless a more compelling argument comes up, I'll stick to this going forward. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
