On Saturday, February 07, 2015 01:24:36 PM Dan Carpenter wrote: > Facts: > 1) None of these four error messages will ever be printed. > http://lwn.net/Articles/627419/ > 2) These messages are a waste of RAM. So this is what the changelog should be saying, not that it "fixes checkpatch warnings". checkpatch warnings in *existing* code are meaningless, unless they uncover a *real* problem in it which quite arguably this one is. But in those cases patch changelogs should talk about the *real* problems and they don't even need to mention checkpatch then as far as I'm concerned. Send this one with a better changelog and I'll apply it. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
