From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 18:36:35 +0100 The vfree() function performs also input parameter validation. Thus the test around the call is not needed. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c b/drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c index 3588dc3..3686c4e 100644 --- a/drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c +++ b/drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c @@ -556,10 +556,8 @@ static int stk_free_sio_buffers(struct stk_camera *dev) nbufs = dev->n_sbufs; dev->n_sbufs = 0; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->spinlock, flags); - for (i = 0; i < nbufs; i++) { - if (dev->sio_bufs[i].buffer != NULL) - vfree(dev->sio_bufs[i].buffer); - } + for (i = 0; i < nbufs; i++) + vfree(dev->sio_bufs[i].buffer); kfree(dev->sio_bufs); dev->sio_bufs = NULL; return 0; -- 2.2.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html