On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:32:10PM +0100, walter harms wrote: > maybe this can be changed into > (void) phy_power_off(hpriv->port_phys[port]); > > that would tell the compiler and other readers that this is intentional. That's too anal to be helpful and too spurious to become even remotely consistent. Things like that are actualy harmful. Note that we have an annotation marking the other way - __must_check. Balance is to be found towards that direction, not this, so please stop. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
