On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Kumar Amit Mehta <gmate.amit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The comment for intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler() is not consistent > with the code and the rest of the comment for this routine. This patch > fixes this typo in comment. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Amit Mehta <gmate.amit@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c > index 77af512..04e248d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c > @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ bool intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > } > > /** > - * intel_pch_fifo_underrun_irq_handler - handle PCH fifo underrun interrupt > + * intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler - handle CPU fifo underrun interrupt > * @dev_priv: i915 device instance > * @pipe: (CPU) pipe to set state for > * > -- > 2.1.0 > -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
