Re: [PATCH] MTD: Deletion of checks before the function call "iounmap"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The only evidence I see is a long thread of similar patches from
> the last several months, of varying (though not increasing) quality.

I find it acceptable that some of my update suggestions do not fit
to your quality expectations at the moment.


> Prior objections to your approach were met with a distinct lack
> of self-awareness on your part.

I guess that a bit more clarification of this view will help
to resolve some open issues, won't it?


> I don't really see many challenges here to tackle, except for the
> social issue of dealing with patch bots like you.

I hope that you will like other automatic source code analysis results.


> Your automated patches are generally not solving real problems,

I try to clean-up Linux source files a bit. Problem solving
with a higher value might follow ...


> but they are at times introducing bugs.

There are the usual different opinions and disagreements
which might be still waiting for a constructive solution.

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux