Hi Dan,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:30:44PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We recently re-arranged the code in these functions and now static
> checkers complain that "ret" is uninitialized. Oddly enough GCC is fine
> with this code.
>
> Fixes: d1ebc463cf89 ('mm: page_counter: pull "-1" handling out of page_counter_memparse()')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
This code was again re-arranged in -mm, and that
ret = page_counter_memparse()
is now happening unconditionally, so I think it should be fine. The
latest mmots snapshot (mmots-2015-01-21-16-38) has it.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
