Am 08.12.2014 um 08:11 schrieb Julia Lawall:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
>>> index 35aef5e..0a9c41f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
>>> @@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>
>>> cpu_type = platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
>>>
>>> - pr_debug("s3c2410_nand_probe(%p)\n", pdev);
>>> + pr_debug("%s(%p)\n", __func__, pdev);
>>
>> I think we can drop the line completely.
>> We have ftrace to trace function calls...
>
> Should the "initialised ok" at the end of the function be remove as well?
>
> Will it be confusing if this cleanup is done in this function, but not in
> others where it may be useful? Perhaps s3c2410_nand_update_chip, for
> example?
Hmm, this driver seems to have a lot of debugging printks().
IMHO we can remove them.
Let's see what Brain says.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
