Re: [patch] i40e: precedence bug in i40e_get_pfc_delay()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 19:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The ">>" operation has higher precedence than the "&" operation.  Also
> the casting is not needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This is static checker work and I haven't tested it on real hardware.

As Shannon has already mentioned, we found this internally and I think
that I already have a patch in the queue to resolve this.  Thank you,
and if I find I am incorrect and we do not already have a patch
resolving this, I will add your patch to the queue.  Thank you Dan!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux