Re: [PATCH 0/1] Replace DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 03:56:02PM +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
> We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over
> `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines.
> This issue was reported by checkpatch.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/):
> 
> // <smpl>
> 
> @@
> identifier i;
> declarer name DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE;
> initializer z;
> @@
> 
> - DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(i)
> + const struct pci_device_id i[]
> = z;
> 
> // </smpl>
> 
> I previously sent parts of this patch to check wether or not it was
> worth sending, and Bjorn answered:
> > Benoit, how about if you wait until about half-way through the merge
> > window after v3.16 releases, generate an up-to-date single patch, and
> > post that?  Then we can try to get it in before v3.17-rc1 to minimize
> > merge hassles.
> 
> So here it is, based on linux-next on 2014-08-07.

Applied to my for-linus branch for v3.17, thanks!

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux