On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:36:47PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:11:18PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> > > This patch cleanup coding style issues reported by checkpatch.
> > >
> > > Tested by compilation only.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Cahnges from V1:
> > > - Sent all patches in a series
> >
> > Why did you forget the other thing that I asked you to change?
> >
> > I can't take these as-is, sorry, please go back and re-read what I
> > wrote...
>
> Actually I was trying to do what you asked me on this E-mail:
>
> -- // --
> You just sent me 4 patches, all with the same subject (but at least 2 of
> them had the order in which to apply them in, which is nice.)
>
> Please redo these such that they have a unique subject, and I can tell
> which order to apply them in, as I really have no idea about the second
> two.
> -- // --
>
> I'm sending V3 as a single patch.
That's going to get rejected as well :(
You did put them in a nice order, but you had the same subject text for
each patch, which I told you not to do, right?
{sigh}
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
