On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:59:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 02:33:43PM +0200, Davide Gianforte wrote: > > + uint32_t ctrl_ext = BPCTL_READ_REG(pbpctl_dev, CTRL_EXT); > > > > - ctrl_ext = BPCTL_READ_REG(pbpctl_dev, CTRL_EXT); > > How about just removing the " = 0;" part of the variable definition? > That would be a smaller patch, and still keep everything "clean". > > thanks, > > greg k-h Also I prefer the style to keep definitions separated from assignments. I've seen a lot of kernel code which initialize variables with function returns, but as you said, it is not "clean", even if it is code-correct. I'll rewrite the patch and I will send asap. thanks davide -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
