Hi Emil, Le lundi 26 mai 2014 à 18:41 +0200, Emil Goode a écrit : > The first two patches in the series are created from v4 of the > original patch, since I have not changed how the code works I think > it is correct to keep the original author and Signed-off-by line. > > Best regards, Thanks for the update. I wasn't interested in splitting the patch in two separate chunks, thinking that shrinking the size of the structure then increasing it of roughly the same amount was not the best way to sell the changes :) Unfortunately, as noted by Uwe, you not only split the patch but also broke it ;) If we're going to split the patch, it should be split in: 1) replace name[1] by name[] (or name[0]) to remove the implicit padding from platform_device structure 2) add dma_mask to platform_object structure and use it to initialize dev.dma_mask. Anyway, as Russel explained in another mail, unconditionally set dev.dma_mask pointer is probably going to break, so this part (2) need some rework, I'm gonna try to do. Thanks for reminding me about this patch. Regards. -- Yann Droneaud OPTEYA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
