On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 08:24:33PM +0200, Manuel Schoelling wrote: > On So, 2014-05-25 at 11:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:08:59PM +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote: > > > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are > > > modified to use time_before() instead of plain, error-prone math. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@xxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > This patch doesn't apply, can you please refresh it against my latest > > tree and resend? > That's weird. I pulled the lastest master from Linus and rebased the > patch, but no modification of my patch was required (latest commit > before my patch to that file was > 8943a92fc257c439ffe55fb0f9896be57c58c56b according to my repo). > > Maybe you have a more recent version than Linus? I have a much different version from Linus, with a few thousand patches added, otherwise how would I be able to queue up stuff to go to Linus for the next kernel release? :) For the staging patches, either use the linux-next tree (which you should use for all kernel development), or my staging.git tree, and the staging-next branch on git.kernel.org, which is what gets pulled into linux-next every week-day. If you have more questions about this, take a look at Documentation/development-process/ it should explain how patches move to Linus and why working against Linus's tree isn't going to get you very far. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
