On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 05:22:00PM +0200, Emil Goode wrote: > Hello Uwe and Greg, > > > You'd do a better deed if you picked up > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1613364/focus=1635995 > > Since there is nothing wrong with the last version of the patch in > the above thread, I feel strange about picking it up and just splitting > it into two patches. However it would be good to have it applied. > > I think the reason why the author didn't resend is that the object file > and data structure layout information in the changelog depend on the > changes to both .name and .dma_mask and by splitting the patch this > information would not apply to any one of the resulting two patches. > > Perhaps keeping this information in the changelog is a good reason for > applying the patch as it is? If you read the thread, I explained why I didn't want to take the patch as-is. Please feel free to break it up as asked for and I'll be glad to consider it then. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
