On Mon, 19 May 2014, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:07:52PM +0000, Saurav Kashyap wrote: > > Hi Julia, > > > > Status is already set to 0 at the beginning of the function, I think > > we should just "return status" here to be consistent with the rest of > > the function. > > "return 0;" is more clear than "return status;". > > Consistency is great so long as it makes the code easier to read. Don't > lose track of the real goal. If status were an informative word, there might be a reason for it. But integer typed functions almost always return their status, so there is no real information. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
