On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:35:55PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 01:08:36AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > Let's look at that error handling again. > > > > err: <-- the name is not descriptive. the location is bad. > > kfree(pdev->dev.dma_mask); <- null dereference. > > platform_device_put(pdev); <- ok > > return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); <- should be "return ERR_PTR(ret);" > > > > 3 out of 4 of the lines are bad. > > 2 out of 4. kfree(NULL) is perfectly legal. pdev was NULL though... The bug is *caused* by trying to use the same "err" label to do all error handling. This is a very common anti-patern, but if you follow canonical kernel style then your error handling is less buggy. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
