On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:17:16PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:29 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > We know "ret" is zero here. No need to check again. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Dan with the latest bunch of patches I just pushed and that Dave > accepted, the code changes which directly affect your patch to leaves > your patch only changing the return statement from: > > return ret; > > to > > return 0; > > but with the recent change in the code, the ret value can be something > other than 0 so your patch does not appear to be needed any longer. Sure, yep. It's not needed anymore. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
