This seems like a harmless off by one overflow if "i" is the last
element in the vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[] array.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Not tested. I always wonder if it's worth fixing these or if it's worth
reporting them? Either of those seem like a lot of work for something
harmless.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index c6976257eff5..7d02c0fc768c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ static int move_to_next_stateful_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int i)
e->flags &= ~KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT;
/* when no next entry is found, the current entry[i] is reselected */
- for (j = i + 1; ; j = (j + 1) % nent) {
+ for (j = (i + 1) % nent; ; j = (j + 1) % nent) {
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *ej = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[j];
if (ej->function == e->function) {
ej->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
