Re: [E1000-devel] [patch v2] i40e: potential array underflow in i40e_vc_process_vf_msg()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:19:58PM +0000, Brown, Aaron F wrote:
> Thanks Dan, I have applied it to Jeff's tree.  It still did not apply
> cleanly but I went ahead and spun a new patch with the change to get
> it into the queue.  Not sure what was going on, only visible
> difference I could see is the original tree seemed to contain:
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 			   u32 v_retval, u8 *msg, u16 msglen)
> {
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> While the patch was looking for:
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 			   u32 v_retval, u8 *msg, u16 msglen)  {
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 

Sorry about that, but I think the problem is in one of your mail servers
somewhere.  The email in the marc.info archive has the curly braces in
the right place.

http://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=138943435730292&w=2

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux