On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 00:27 +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: > The variable continual is only assigned the values true and false. > Change its type to bool. [] > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/efuse.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/efuse.c [] > @@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ static void efuse_power_switch(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 write, u8 pwrstate) > > static u16 efuse_get_current_size(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) > { > - int continual = true; > + bool continual = true; > u16 efuse_addr = 0; > u8 hworden; > u8 efuse_data, word_cnts; Yes, this could use bool, but would probably be better written without continual at all as it is before this patch: static u16 efuse_get_current_size(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) { int continual = true; u16 efuse_addr = 0; u8 hworden; u8 efuse_data, word_cnts; while (continual && efuse_one_byte_read(hw, efuse_addr, &efuse_data) && (efuse_addr < EFUSE_MAX_SIZE)) { if (efuse_data != 0xFF) { hworden = efuse_data & 0x0F; word_cnts = efuse_calculate_word_cnts(hworden); efuse_addr = efuse_addr + (word_cnts * 2) + 1; } else { continual = false; } } return efuse_addr; } I think writing it without continual, which is effectively an ersatz "break", would be better Something like: static u16 efuse_get_current_size(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) { u16 efuse_addr = 0; u8 hworden; u8 efuse_data, word_cnts; while (efuse_one_byte_read(hw, efuse_addr, &efuse_data) && (efuse_addr < EFUSE_MAX_SIZE) { if (efuse_data == 0xff) break; hworden = efuse_data & 0x0F; word_cnts = efuse_calculate_word_cnts(hworden); efuse_addr = efuse_addr + (word_cnts * 2) + 1; } return efuse_addr; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html