On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:38:57AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
This patch redefine function xhci_readl.xhci_readl function doesn't use xhci_hcd argument.
Hence there is no need of keeping it in the function arguments.
Redefining this function breaks other functions which calls this function.
This phatch also correct those calls in xhci driver.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gaurav <kumargauravgupta3@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Could you put a list of changes since v2 here?:
v3: blah blah changelog mostly.
Also this doesn't apply for me against linux-next.
regards,
dan carpenter
There's no change from v2. I was sending the same patch again because
the last one was lacking good description and i was told (or as i
understood) that if I'm sending the same patch or patch for the same
purpose as previous then i should increment version so i did.
I had developed this patch against linux-git, haven't tested that on
linux-next as i haven't cloned linux-next yet.
I've started cloning linux-next and as it's not applying on linux-next,
I'll try it on linux-next (once i cloned it) and will send again.
Regards
Kumar Gaurav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
