Re: [patch] [media] s5k6aa: off by one in s5k6aa_enum_frame_interval()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sylwester,

On Friday 23 August 2013 15:11:49 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 08/23/2013 02:54 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 23 August 2013 12:33:06 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >> The check is off by one so we could read one space past the end of the
> >> array.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Mauro, I have no other pending sensor patches, can you pick this one up
> > from the list, or should I send you a pull request ?
> 
> I can handle all pending patches for the Samsung sensors, I was planning
> to send a pull request today. I can pick up the ov9650 patch as well.
> I'd like to also include the s5k5bafx sensor patch in one of my pull
> requests.
> 
> IIRC it was agreed that we as Samsung will handle our stuff ourselves
> and be sending it to Mauro directly.

That's less work for me, so I will definitely not complain :-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux