On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:57:57AM +0200, walter harms wrote: > > > Am 21.08.2013 10:24, schrieb Dan Carpenter: > > The intent was to test if a flag was set. In the current code the > > conditions are always true. > > I guess that it worked before ... > That leaves the Question: are the tests needed at all ? It's flagging everything as broken, and I presume that isn't good. But on the other hand, these changes do occasionally break things because now a lot of new untested code is used. It really is a good idea for someone to test this. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Static checker stuff. Untested. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
