On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 20:36 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On 08/20/2013 07:22:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > I'm also saying that the trivial tree should > > have some visibility about whether or not a > > patch or series will be handled by the trivial > > maintainer or not. [] > > Jiri has not responded to this point. > He did. Twice. Not really. > > Silence about the status of patches that extends > > for months is not good. > > He has a public git tree. Yes, I know. > I've found that if a patch isn't in there, he hasn't picked > it up yet. It's the visibility of if/yet/when for the trivial patches submitted and unresponded to that's the question. And no, Jiri hasn't responded with any intention of making any such scheme public. I think a public patchwork queue like netdev's could work reasonably well. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
