On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Julia,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Use devm_ioremap_resource instead of devm_request_and_ioremap.
> >
> > This was partly done using the semantic patch
> > scripts/coccinelle/api/devm_ioremap_resource.cocci
> >
> > The error-handling code on the call to platform_get_resource was removed
> > manually, and the initialization of smmu->size was manually moved lower, to
> > take advantage of the NULL test on res performed by devm_ioremap_resource.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 11 +++--------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > index ebd0a4c..dd91465 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > @@ -1761,15 +1761,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > smmu->dev = dev;
> >
> > res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > - if (!res) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "missing base address/size\n");
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > - }
> > -
> > + smmu->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > + if (IS_ERR(smmu->base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(smmu->base);
> > smmu->size = resource_size(res);
> > - smmu->base = devm_request_and_ioremap(dev, res);
> > - if (!smmu->base)
> > - return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>
> This does mean we trade arguably more useful error codes for the catch-all
> -EINVAL, but the code ends up looking neater so I can be swayed either way.
>
> Is this part of a series you're dealing with, or would you like me to take
> this (I already sent my SMMU patches for 3.12)?
Please take it onwards. Thanks.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
