On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 21:32 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > These patches result from the following semantic patch > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/), which checks for expression statements > separated by , rather than by ;. The rule is quite conservative in that it > only finds cases where this pattern appears after a statement that ends > with ;, to ensure that the expression statements do not form an if branch > or loop body. Iteration is used to treat arbitrary sequences of commas. Nice. Maybe there also some cases where a block close brace is followed by a statement , then statement ; Like from fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c 231 if ((unsigned int)cur_free >= 232 (vn->vn_size - 233 ((vi->vi_type & VI_TYPE_LEFT_MERGEABLE) ? IH_SIZE : 0))) { 234 /* all contents of S[0] fits into L[0] */ 235 236 RFALSE(vn->vn_mode == M_INSERT || vn->vn_mode == M_PASTE, 237 "vs-8055: invalid mode or balance condition failed"); 238 239 tb->lnum[0] = vn->vn_nr_item; 240 tb->lbytes = -1; 241 return; 242 } 243 244 d_size = 0, ih_size = IH_SIZE; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
