On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:26:14PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We cleaned up this code to use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of just the number
> 4. The problem is that data->reg_temp[] has 5 elements and we actually
> wanted ARRAY_SIZE(data->temp) which has 4 elements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Hi Dan,
good catch, except that the array size of data->temp[] should be 5, not 4.
So the real culprit is commit 7cbbd6a (Add support for critical low/high
temperature limits on NCT6106) which increased the size of reg_temp but not the
size of temp.
Do you want to send me a patch fixing that, or should I take care of it ?
Thanks,
Guenter
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
> index f0941d7..52b6a92 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
> @@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ static struct nct6775_data *nct6775_update_device(struct device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < NUM_TEMP; i++) {
> if (!(data->have_temp & (1 << i)))
> continue;
> - for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(data->reg_temp); j++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(data->temp); j++) {
> if (data->reg_temp[j][i])
> data->temp[j][i]
> = nct6775_read_temp(data,
> @@ -3974,7 +3974,7 @@ static int nct6775_resume(struct device *dev)
> if (!(data->have_temp & (1 << i)))
> continue;
>
> - for (j = 1; j < ARRAY_SIZE(data->reg_temp); j++)
> + for (j = 1; j < ARRAY_SIZE(data->temp); j++)
> if (data->reg_temp[j][i])
> nct6775_write_temp(data, data->reg_temp[j][i],
> data->temp[j][i]);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
