Am 29.05.2013 09:02, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> Static checkers complain that this is declared as an unsigned long
> but we only ever use the low 32 bits (ignoring sign expansion).
> But from the context, it should just be an unsigned short.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-renesas-tpu.c b/drivers/leds/leds-renesas-tpu.c
> index 9483f1c..fe1fbd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-renesas-tpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-renesas-tpu.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ static inline void r_tpu_write(struct r_tpu_priv *p, int reg_nr,
> static void r_tpu_start_stop_ch(struct r_tpu_priv *p, int start)
> {
> struct led_renesas_tpu_config *cfg = p->pdev->dev.platform_data;
> - unsigned long flags, value;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned short value;
>
When it is using the lower 32bit may "int" is better ?
re,
wh
> /* start stop register shared by multiple timer channels */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&r_tpu_lock, flags);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
