2013-05-24 (금), 14:23 +0300, Dan Carpenter: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:46:08PM +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > From ded3c78fcb6dd8c39a8664471544942e51ff9faf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 12:41:04 +0900 > > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: align data types between on-disk and in-memory > > block > > addresses > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > > linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > The on-disk block address is defined as __le32, but in-memory block > > address, > > block_t, does as u64. > > > > Let's synchronize them to 32 bits. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > What you say sounds good to me. Could you give me the reported-by > tag instead of the Signed-off-by? The Signed-off-by means it went > through my hands and it's intended as sort of a legal thing like > signing a document. Ok, I see. Thank you very much for the notification. :) > > regards, > dan carpenter -- Jaegeuk Kim Samsung
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
