Hi Dan, Yes. I agree with your comment. Acked-by: anandkumar_santhanam@xxxxxxxx Regards Anand -----Original Message----- From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 6:18 PM To: xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx; Anand Kumar Santhanam Cc: lindar_liu@xxxxxxxxx; James E.J. Bottomley; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: [patch] [SCSI] pm80xx: remove unneeded NULL check Coccinelle complains about the inconsistent NULL checking on "t". It turns out the check isn't needed because we verified that "t" is non-NULL at the start of the function. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c index 69dd49c..683df42 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c @@ -3740,7 +3740,7 @@ int pm8001_mpi_task_abort_resp(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void *piomb) pm8001_ccb_task_free(pm8001_ha, t, ccb, tag); mb(); - if ((pm8001_dev->id & NCQ_ABORT_ALL_FLAG) && t) { + if (pm8001_dev->id & NCQ_ABORT_ALL_FLAG) { pm8001_tag_free(pm8001_ha, tag); sas_free_task(t); /* clear the flag */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
