Re: [patch 2/2] tipc: potential divide by zero in tipc_link_recv_fragment()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:38:53PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 06-05-2013 22:29, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> >The worry here is that fragm_sz could be zero since it comes from
> >skb->data.
> 
> >Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> >diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
> >index 3a6064b3..de94493 100644
> >--- a/net/tipc/link.c
> >+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
> >@@ -2524,14 +2524,16 @@ int tipc_link_recv_fragment(struct sk_buff **pending, struct sk_buff **fb,
> >  		struct tipc_msg *imsg = (struct tipc_msg *)msg_data(fragm);
> >  		u32 msg_sz = msg_size(imsg);
> >  		u32 fragm_sz = msg_data_sz(fragm);
> >-		u32 exp_fragm_cnt = msg_sz/fragm_sz + !!(msg_sz % fragm_sz);
> >+		u32 exp_fragm_cnt;
> >  		u32 max =  TIPC_MAX_USER_MSG_SIZE + NAMED_H_SIZE;
> >+
> >  		if (msg_type(imsg) == TIPC_MCAST_MSG)
> >  			max = TIPC_MAX_USER_MSG_SIZE + MCAST_H_SIZE;
> >-		if (msg_size(imsg) > max) {
> >+		if (fragm_sz == 0 || msg_size(imsg) > max) {
> >  			kfree_skb(fbuf);
> >  			return 0;
> >  		}
> >+		exp_fragm_cnt = msg_sz/fragm_sz + !!(msg_sz % fragm_sz);
> 
>    Don't you think spaces around / should be added at least for
> consistency with %?

Yep.  I missed that.  I'll resend.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux