On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:11:21PM +0530, devendra.aaru wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > msglen comes from get_user() so we need to check that it's not too
> > large.
> >
> > The first element of "pioctl_dpram" is a short which holds the size of
> > the data the user wants. I have chosen a limit which lets us fill the
> > rest of the struct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > msglen is also apparently network endian? My guess is that we should
> > just delete this code instead of trying to fix it.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> > index 3251d2e..e0056c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> > @@ -703,6 +703,8 @@ static long ft1000_ioctl (struct file *file, unsigned int command,
> > break;
> > msglen = htons(msglen);
> > //DEBUG("FT1000:ft1000_ioctl:msg length = %x\n", msglen);
> > + if (msglen > sizeof(*pioctl_dpram) - sizeof(short))
> > + msglen = sizeof(*pioctl_dpram) - sizeof(short);
>
> doing this may be wrong too? because its in network endian format.
> does deleting msglen = htons(msglen)
> and adding your change makes sense?
Yeah. Probably my patch doesn't make sense by itself.
It's hard to say what the right thing is here without having a way
to test it or knowing what userspace does.
I do suspect that the right thing is to just delete this code.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
