On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 17:04 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 00:26 +0100, Mirsal Ennaime wrote:
> > Remove one level of indentation from the binder proc page release code
> > by using slightly different control semantics.
> >
> > This is a cosmetic patch which removes checkpatch "80-columns" warnings
>
> More trivia:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/binder.c b/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
> []
> > @@ -3001,17 +3001,20 @@ static void binder_deferred_release(struct binder_proc *proc)
> > int i;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < proc->buffer_size / PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
> > - if (proc->pages[i]) {
> > - void *page_addr = proc->buffer + i * PAGE_SIZE;
> > - binder_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_BUFFER_ALLOC,
> > - "binder_release: %d: page %d at %p not freed\n",
> > - proc->pid, i,
> > - page_addr);
> > - unmap_kernel_range((unsigned long)page_addr,
> > - PAGE_SIZE);
> > - __free_page(proc->pages[i]);
> > - page_count++;
> > - }
> > + void *page_addr;
> > +
> > + if (!proc->pages[i])
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + page_addr = proc->buffer + i * PAGE_SIZE;
> > + binder_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_BUFFER_ALLOC,
> > + "binder_release: %d: page %d at %p not freed\n",
> > + proc->pid, i,
> > + page_addr);
> > + unmap_kernel_range((unsigned long)page_addr,
> > + PAGE_SIZE);
>
> Please align single function call args to open parenthesis.
> Please fill to 80 chars where appropriate.
Fixed in v3, thanks!
> I think using %s, __func__ is better than embedded function names.
>
> like:
> binder_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_BUFFER_ALLOC,
> "%s: %d: page %d at %p not freed\n",
> __func__, proc->pid, i, page_addr);
> unmap_kernel_range((unsigned long)page_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
Indeed, however binder_release is not the name of the calling function,
nor is it further up the stack. You are probably right in that __func__
should be printed rather than binder_release as it is a bit misleading.
I'm adding a separate patch for this.
> Also for the binder folk:
>
> I think it's odd to use pr_info in binder_debug.
> Why not use KERN_DEBUG or pr_debug/dynamic_debugging?
>
> #define binder_debug(mask, x...) \
> do { \
> if (binder_debug_mask & mask) \
> pr_info(x); \
> } while (0)
I'd be happy to change it to use pr_debug if that is correct.
Best regards,
--
mirsal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
