[patch] NFC: llcp: cleanup underflow check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Szymon Janc suggested I should move the lower bound check into the
caller and make it match the check for NFC_MAX_GT_LEN.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nfc.h b/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
index 87a6417..e50dd2c 100644
--- a/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
+++ b/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct nfc_ops {
 
 #define NFC_TARGET_IDX_ANY -1
 #define NFC_MAX_GT_LEN 48
+#define NFC_MIN_GT_LEN 3
 #define NFC_ATR_RES_GT_OFFSET 15
 
 struct nfc_target {
diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c
index 6ceee8e..e2c3b6e 100644
--- a/net/nfc/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/core.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ int nfc_set_remote_general_bytes(struct nfc_dev *dev, u8 *gb, u8 gb_len)
 {
 	pr_debug("dev_name=%s gb_len=%d\n", dev_name(&dev->dev), gb_len);
 
-	if (gb_len > NFC_MAX_GT_LEN)
+	if (gb_len < NFC_MIN_GT_LEN || gb_len > NFC_MAX_GT_LEN)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb(dev, gb, gb_len);
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
index 7f8266d..7be27fb 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
@@ -547,8 +547,6 @@ int nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb(struct nfc_dev *dev, u8 *gb, u8 gb_len)
 		pr_err("No LLCP device\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
-	if (gb_len < 3)
-		return -EINVAL;
 
 	memset(local->remote_gb, 0, NFC_MAX_GT_LEN);
 	memcpy(local->remote_gb, gb, gb_len);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux