On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:42:23PM +0100, walter harms wrote: > but i am missing the point why where are two counters. > i is simple. it is used to check the bitfield hw->channel_info.results.scanchannels > n is increased only the when a bit is set. So it would be more easy to simply > count the bits and run the loop about that number. > But i can also imagine that the bitfield act as "enable" and the author actualy > should read &inf->info.chinforesult.result[i]; > > perhaps i am missing the point, could someone tell me were i am wrong ? > Reading your email again, I can see what you mean. I don't have the hardware though or any more info than you do. I can only assume that the original code works. My patch doesn't change anything or introduce any bugs that weren't there in the original. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
