Am 01.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> We need to decrement "i" first because the current "i" was not allocated
> succesfully. Also we should go free the way down to zero to avoid a
> leak.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> index 438c7fa..9557414 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> @@ -2351,7 +2351,7 @@ static int sony_nc_lid_resume_setup(struct platform_device *pd)
> return 0;
>
> liderror:
> - for (; i > 0; i--)
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> device_remove_file(&pd->dev, &lid_ctl->attrs[i]);
>
> kfree(lid_ctl);
i have learned that most people get confused when you do loop
"the-other-way-around". (typical errors see above). Maybe it
would be better foe further generations to turn the loop on its
head like:
int c;
for(c=0; c < i ; c++)
device_remove_file(&pd->dev, &lid_ctl->attrs[c]);
kfree(lid_ctl);
re,
wh
yes, there is one var more
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
