[patch] NFC: llcp: integer underflow in nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If gb_len is less than 3 it would cause an integer underflow and
possibly memory corruption in nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv().

I removed the old test for gb_len == 0.  I also removed the test for
->remote_gb == NULL.  It's not possible for ->remote_gb to be NULL and
we have already dereferenced ->remote_gb_len so it's too late to test.

The old test return -ENODEV but my test returns -EINVAL.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
index 85bc75c..746f5a2 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
@@ -549,14 +549,13 @@ int nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb(struct nfc_dev *dev, u8 *gb, u8 gb_len)
 		pr_err("No LLCP device\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
+	if (gb_len < 3)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	memset(local->remote_gb, 0, NFC_MAX_GT_LEN);
 	memcpy(local->remote_gb, gb, gb_len);
 	local->remote_gb_len = gb_len;
 
-	if (local->remote_gb == NULL || local->remote_gb_len == 0)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	if (memcmp(local->remote_gb, llcp_magic, 3)) {
 		pr_err("MAC does not support LLCP\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux