On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:04:38PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 22:40 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > There is a kind of precedence problem here, but it doesn't affect how > > the code works because ->serial_signals is unsigned char. We want to > > clear two flags here. > > > > #define SerialSignal_RTS 0x20 /* Request to Send */ > > #define SerialSignal_DTR 0x80 /* Data Terminal Ready */ > > > > Without the parenthesis then it does: > > > > info->serial_signals &= 0x5f; > > > > With the parenthesis it does: > > > > info->serial_signals &= 0xffffff5f; > > > > info->serial_signals is an unsigned char so the two statements are > > equivalent, but it's cleaner to add the parenthesis. In other dtr_rts() > > functions the parenthesis are there so this makes it more consistent. > > > Wouldn't it be clearer still to use | instead of + > Yeah. I think it would be, but adding bitflags together instead of doing bitwise ORs is very common as well. I would Ack the patch you sent though. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
