RE: Q: generic module{init,exit} boilerplate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:58 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:12:43AM -0600, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> There are a number of drivers/modules in the kernel that have
>>> a "do nothing" module init/exit of the form:
>>>
>>
>> Do you have a real life example?  Why would people do that?
>
> I find 39 occurrences, although the first one I looked at had a big #if 0
> in the module_init function.  Here are some examples:
>
> drivers/media/common/saa7146/saa7146_fops.c
> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_mediabus.c
> drivers/tty/serial/suncore.c
>
> There are also a bunch of comedi drivers.  Around half of the examples are
> sound drivers, eg:
>
> sound/synth/emux/emux.c
> sound/synth/util_mem.c
> sound/isa/sb/sb16_csp.c

Most of them appear to be in modules that provide exported functions for
other drivers/modules. These modules do nothing by themselves so I guess
they have the do nothing module_{init,exit} just because it's required since
they can be modules.

That brings up the question...

Do these types of helper modules actually require the module_{init,exit}?
Would the module load properly without it? They don't _do_ anything other
than EXPORT a number of symbols for other modules.

Regards,
Hartley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux