Re: [Line6linux-devel] [PATCH] line6: Use kmemdup rather than duplicating its implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:34:07PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Laurent Navet <laurent.navet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > staging: line6: driver.c
> >  The semantic patch that makes this output is available
> >  in scripts/coccinelle/api/memdup.cocci.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Navet <laurent.navet@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/line6/driver.c |    5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/line6/driver.c b/drivers/staging/line6/driver.c
> > index f5c19b2..e1d6241 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/line6/driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/line6/driver.c
> > @@ -331,14 +331,13 @@ int line6_version_request_async(struct usb_line6 *line6)
> >         char *buffer;
> >         int retval;
> >
> > -       buffer = kmalloc(sizeof(line6_request_version), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +       buffer = kmemdup(line6_request_version,
> > +                       sizeof(line6_request_version), GFP_ATOMIC);
> >         if (buffer == NULL) {
> >                 dev_err(line6->ifcdev, "Out of memory");
> >                 return -ENOMEM;
> >         }
> >
> > -       memcpy(buffer, line6_request_version, sizeof(line6_request_version));
> > -
> >         retval = line6_send_raw_message_async(line6, buffer,
> >                                               sizeof(line6_request_version));
> >         kfree(buffer);
> > --
> > 1.7.10.4
> 
> Your change is fine but I'm not sure whether we should allocate memory
> in the first place:
> 
> line6_send_raw_message_async() returns before the transfer is
> complete.  It submits one or more URBs but I cannot see a guarantee
> that the buffer is no longer needed.  It seems unsafe to kfree(buffer)
> before the request is complete.
> 

As Greg pointed out we do need to allocate the memory to make DMA
work.  But you're right that it is a use after free bug.  We should
move the kfree(msg->buffer) to inside line6_async_request_sent().
I can send a fix for this tomorrow or if someone else wants to do it
while I'm sleeping that's fine too.  :)

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux