On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:07:25AM -0600, Russ Anderson wrote: > The issue isn't "ulong" vs "unsigned long". The issue > is int is 32 bit and long is 64 bit on x86_64. Your > patch is casting the value as an "unsigned long" (64 bit > on x86_64) into an int (32 bit). I don't think that > was your intent. Wait what? I only did int => long casts, not the other way around. It occured to me to use u64 but this code is only compiled on x86_64 and I wrote my patch to match the surrounding context. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
