Re: [parisc:for-next 1/1] include/linux/irq.h:361:24: fatal error: asm/hw_irq.h: No such file or directory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:48:37AM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 18:45 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:41:10AM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 18:10 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > > Hi James,
> > > > 
> > > > FYI, kernel build failed on
> > > > 
> > > > tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/parisc-2.6.git for-next
> > > > head:   07abad0579de44f8250dfee5ddc253062d050dc0
> > > > commit: 07abad0579de44f8250dfee5ddc253062d050dc0 [1/1] [PARISC] asm: redo generic includes
> > > > config: parisc-defconfig # make ARCH=parisc defconfig
> > > > 
> > > > All error/warnings:
> > > > 
> > > > In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:12:0,
> > > >                  from arch/parisc/include/asm/hardirq.h:9,
> > > >                  from include/linux/hardirq.h:7,
> > > >                  from arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:34:
> > > > include/linux/irq.h:361:24: fatal error: asm/hw_irq.h: No such file or directory
> > > > compilation terminated.
> > > 
> > > Thanks ... somehow a 1 letter typo got introduced into KBuild as I added
> > > a couple of new ones from the merge window.  The reason the build didn't
> > > fail for me is because generic generated files don't get removed, so I
> > > already had a hw_irq.h from a previous run.
> > > 
> > > I've fixed up the commit.
> > 
> > OK, thanks for the quick fix!
> > 
> > > I'm impressed you have a parisc build environment, by the way. Thanks,
> > 
> > I'm doing allnoconfig and defconfig builds for parisc now. Are there
> > more configs that you would recommend? Perhaps:
> > 
> >         712_defconfig
> >         a500_defconfig
> >         b180_defconfig
> >         c3000_defconfig
> 
> C3000 and B180 are what I tend to do ... plus a PA8900 build, which
> isn't in the defconfigs.  712 should work, but no-one seems to have the
> hardware to verify these days (it's also a fully incoherent arch, so it
> activates "interesting" build options).

OK, I just adds c3000_defconfig/b180_defconfig to the build matrix. If
you push the PA8900 config to upstream, I'll pick it up too :-)

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux