Re: [patch] isdn: fix a wrapping bug in isdn_ppp_ioctl()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 16:44 +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 15:59 +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > > Seems to me the code is expecting 256 bits of data, not any multiple of int,
> > > long or anything else.
> > 
> > include/linux/isdn_ppp.h:#define PPPIOCGCOMPRESSORS _IOR('t',134,unsigned long [8])
> 
> That doesn't mean the whole thing makes any sense on 64bit systems.
> A whole load of historic code used 'long' to ensure 32bit.
> Some of that might have crept into Linux sources.

Very true, but it's exported via copy_to_user.

> Since I suspect there are a maximum of 256 bits on both 32 and 64bit
> systems, I wouldn't like to guess exactly how any particular 64bit
> application chooses to check the bitmap.
> 
> The ioctl constant may be wrong on 64 bit systems.

shrug.  Not much to do about it now.
isdn isn't very active.

Karsten?  What do you think?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux