Hi Sjur, On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry for not responding sooner, but I thought this issue was solved with > your patch "remoteproc: fix (again) the virtio-related build breakage" > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/6/85). > > I'm not sure I understand why you would want to add a dependency to ARM. > But if you're uncomfortable by having STE_MODEM_RPROC directly selectable, > perhaps we could let it be selected by arch specific Kconfig files, e.g. mach-ux500? I would just like the Kconfig dependencies to reflect the "real world": E.g., if there's no chance the STE modem is going to be used on x86, then let's not ask x86 folks about it. Does limiting the STE modem to certain platform/architectures make sense ? (if not, that's ok) Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
