On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 06:27:48PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 10/03/2012 08:07 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >Sparse complains that we use zero instead of NULL here. In fact, the > >initialization is wrong and should be removed. Doing these kinds of > >bogus initializations means that GCC can't detect unitialized variables > >and leads to bugs. > > We already had it fixed internally, but your change is more > sensible. I had it reviewed internally and plan to send it to John > for 3.8 (ie. wireless-next after merge window). Let me know if that > is ok with you. Sounds good. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
