On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:55:16AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > >I'd suggest to fix it in m68k and make atomic64_t generally available. > > > > Fengguang in your testing on any architechtures is atomic64_t missing on anything except some m68k subarchtechtures? > > Eric, it only complaints for m68k, among the architechtures the build > tests covered (alpha arm avr32 blackfin cris frv h8300 i386 ia64 m32r > m68k mips mn10300 openrisc parisc powerpc s390 sh sparc sparc64 tile > um x86_64 xtensa). Sorry, I must missed something (in my system, build errors are only recorded on first sight).. wfg /c/linux% for arch in arch/*/; do grep -ir -q atomic64 $arch || echo $arch; done arch/c6x/ arch/h8300/ arch/mn10300/ arch/score/ arch/unicore32/ So the above archs are likely still missing atomic64_t support. However it should be trivial to add support to them, by adding "select GENERIC_ATOMIC64" lines to them. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
